Home > Investment Concepts > Financial Innovation: Architecture for a House of Cards

Financial Innovation: Architecture for a House of Cards

July 18th, 2010

genie

  The genie is indeed out of the bottle; and the point when it became clear to me that it’s an evil rather than a benevolent genie was when the captains of the securities industry stood before a Congressional Committee and had the temerity to announce that their industry was the “backbone of the American economy.”

Once upon a time, a broker was a facilitator and nothing more. He was someone who was in a position to bring a willing buyer and a willing seller together and help them effect a trade. At that time, bringing investment money to enterprises in need of capital was constructive and deserving of the label of, if not the “backbone of the economy,” certainly its enabler.

Even after 1792 when those 24 brokers, meeting under the buttonwood tree at the foot of Wall Street, formed the New York Stock Exchange, the ability to assist investors desirous of owning shares in one or another company could be considered a wholesome service—but not for very long. Realizing that they could make more money from investors than from investments, the securities industry pioneers guided their industry down a path that took it from constructive investment to gambling, from earning money with one’s money to seeking something for nothing.

Financial innovation has been a characteristic of that industry; and, as the years have passed, the public has been duped into thinking that trading—short term speculation on the movement of the market itself—was actually investing, deserving of the same respect as the part-ownership of thriving businesses.

The genie’s name is Credit. At first reserved for fiscally responsible purposes—collateralized leverage that could produce revenue and income more rapidly than could resources limited to what existing assets could afford, financial innovation carried credit beyond its constructive business use and found justification in encouraging home ownership, collateralized to be sure, but by a home, an asset of substance but one which produced no income.

Eventually, such innovation carried it beyond the point where it was used solely for business and major purchases of valuable assets to the point where, today, credit is used for expendables and to satisfy the self-destructive trend toward converting luxuries into necessities: now the overheating engine of our economy. Like a Ponzi scheme, our society’s misuse of credit has an ultimate dead end. Credit is simply an obligation that extends into the future. And the future is not infinite! As it is, we have already mortgaged our own futures and those of our offspring; and we are well into committing the lives of our grandchildren to satisfy our own cravings for material things to which we are not entitled by virtue of our own productivity.

So, like the Ponzi scheme or chain letter, the trend must end. And just how chaotic and traumatic that end will be depends, unfortunately, upon the courage and intelligence of our elected representatives.

Ellis Investment Concepts

  1. Anonymous
    July 19th, 2010 at 09:54 | #1

    Hi Ellis,

    My dad always said “If you can’t pay cash for something, you have not yet earned it”

    He lives a modest, but financially secure life.

    I see the wisdom of living within one’s means. Many of my friends live from paycheck to paycheck and even a small, unexpected crisis causes them much worry and stress. If they would just learn to budget for life’s unexpected problems, their lives would run much more smoothly.

    A good look at the history of personal credit (credit cards) is the PBS special, Secret History of the Credit Card:

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/credit/

    It shows the predatory mindset of the credit card industry. They are masters of human behavior and manipulation.

    A couple of years ago I had a conversation with Dan Hess on the Compuserve Forum regarding “rebates” from credit cards.

    I respect Dan and always enjoy listening to his thought.

    My perspective was that these rebates were not free. As a business owner accepting credit cards the amount of money I receive is dependent upon which credit card is used. Cards with rebates are simply passed on in higher fees to the merchant. The discount to the merchant can be 2%, 3%, or even 4% for as credit card with a 2% rebate to the consumer.

    This all sounds good to the consumer, but the business owner knows this game is being played so he/she simply raises the price 4% to cover all the bases. The net result is the consumer is duped into thinking they are getting something back when in fact they are only being charged more upfront.

    It’s not the deal you get, it’s the deal you think you get.

    Dan’s final argument was even though he knows the game is being played, he will still lose 2% if he doesn’t take advantage of it.

    I can’t refute that! Are those credit card guys sharp?!

    But my biggest heros now live on the TV show “Pawn Stars.”

    For a secured loan (pawning you item) the star of the TV show charges 10% simple interest per MONTH! Borrow $100 today AND leave your item as security, and you can get it back in a month for $110, two months for $120, and three months for $130. I’m glad he’s not using compound interest! I guess he doesn’t need to!

    You have a two month grace period in which you can stil retrieve for item. Of course that would cost you $140 for the fourth month and $150 for the fifth month.

    After 5 months the pawn shop keeps the item and earns 100% interest.

    So for a year that’s 120% simple interest for the short term loan or 240% interest if you don’t retrieve the item! 12 months divided by 5 months x 100% = 240%

    We should be glad these guys are not running the credit card or banking industry!

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Clicky Web Analytics